Daniel Horwitz is a premier speech defense lawyer who has successfully defended clients against multiple multimillion-dollar libel, slander, false light, and other speech-based lawsuits in Tennessee’s state and federal courts. Horwitz Law defends against speech-based tort claims across Tennessee. Clients represented by Horwitz Law have avoided tens of millions of dollars’ worth of threatened liability and frequently recovered some or all of their attorney’s fees against the people who baselessly sued them. Due to the Tennessee Public Participation Act, if you have been sued for defamation, libel, slander, false light invasion of privacy, defamation by implication or innuendo, the person suing you could be required to pay your legal fees. However, if you have been sued over your speech, it is important to exercise your rights promptly. If you need a speech defense lawyer and would like to purchase a consultation from Horwitz Law, you can do so here. Selected case history appeals below.

Selected Case History

Libel, Slander, and Other Speech-Based Tort Claims:

1. Davidson County Circuit Court, Case No. 21C1607, Klacik v. Owens

-Causes of Action: Libel

-Time to dismissal: 15 months from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal With Prejudice (TPPA Petition to Dismiss Granted)

-Discovery: Yes (party depositions)

-Liability avoided: $20,000,000.00(0/$20 million recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes (Plaintiff paid Defendant $115,000.00 fee-shifting award for attorney’s fees and discretionary costs)

2. Davidson County Circuit Court, Case No. 20C740, Vonhartman v. Butterton

-Causes of Action: Libel, Slander, Malicious Prosecution

-Time to dismissal: Ten weeks from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal With Prejudice (Motion to Dismiss and TPPA Petition to Dismiss Granted)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $750,000.00 (0/$750,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes (Plaintiff paid Defendant $26,500.00 fee-shifting award for attorney’s fees, sanctions, and discretionary costs in addition to court costs)

3. Wilson County Circuit Court, Case No. 2019CV663, Nandigam Neurology v. Devin Yount, et al.

-Causes of Action: Defamation/False Light/Civil Conspiracy

-Time to Dismissal: Six weeks from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice (Motion to Alter/Amend Order of Voluntary Dismissal Granted)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: “No less than $25,000” plus punitive damages ($0.00 of unspecified demand recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($25,000.00 attorney’s fee, cost, and sanction award).

4. Wilson County General Sessions Court, Case No. 2020CV152, Kaveer Nandigam, et al. v. Kelly Beavers

-Causes of Action: Defamation/False Light

-Time to Dismissal: Three weeks from filing of Complaint, Affirmed Unanimously on Appeal

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice (Motion to Dismiss/TPPA Petition to Dismiss Granted and Affirmed With Award of Appellate Attorney’s Fees)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $25,000 ($0.00/$25,000 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($50,000.00 attorney’s fee, cost, and sanction award)

5. Davidson County Circuit Court, Case No. 17C295, Loftis v. Rayburn

-Causes of Action: Defamation by Implication/False Light

-Time to dismissal: Six weeks from filing of Amended Complaint

-Result: Dismissal With Prejudice (Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Granted)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $1.5 million (0/$1.5 million recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($10,000 fee-shifting attorney’s fee award)

6. Davidson County Circuit Court, Case No. 18C362, DS One v. Jamie Bayer, et al.

-Causes of Action: Libel/Misrepresentation by Concealment/Fraud/Negligent Misrepresentation/False Light Invasion of Privacy/Intentional Interference of a Business Relationship/Civil Conspiracy

-Time to dismissal: Five weeks from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice before hearing following Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Agreed/Voluntary)

-Discovery: Yes (limited interrogatories only)

-Liability avoided: $2 million (0/$2 million recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs assessed to Plaintiff

7. Davidson County Circuit Court, Case No. 19C2096 Stevens v. Sees, et al.

-Causes of Action: Defamation/Civil Conspiracy

-Time to Dismissal: Nine weeks from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice before hearing following Motion and TPPA Petition to Dismiss (Agreed/Voluntary)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $150,000 (0/$150,000 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs assessed to Plaintiff

8. Washington County Circuit Court, Case No. 19CV0139, Nicolau v. Citizens Commission on Human Rights, et al.

-Causes of Action: Defamation

-Time to Dismissal: Eleven weeks from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice (Motion to Dismiss Granted)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $8.1 million (0/$8.1 million recovered)

-Fee-shift: Obviated by Plaintiff’s declaration of bankruptcy

9. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Case No. 3:18-cv-00511, Deja Vu of Nashville, et al. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, et al.

-Causes of Action: Civil Conspiracy

-Time to Dismissal: Eight months from filing of Complaint

-Result: Dismissal with Prejudice (Motion to Dismiss Granted)

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: Unspecified ($0.00 of unspecified demand recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs assessed to Plaintiff

10. Sumner County Circuit Court, Case No. 83CC1-2020-CV-616, Adamson v. Grove, et al.

-Causes of Action: False Light Invasion of Privacy, Unreasonable Publicity, Libel, Slander, Intentional Interference With Business Relations, Civil Conspiracy, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

-Time to Dismissal: 12 days from filing of Amended Complaint

-Result: Dismissed without prejudice

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $800,000.00 ($0.00/$800,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs assessed to Plaintiff

11. Dyer County Circuit Court, Case No. 2021-CV-7 (Sells v. Swift, et al.)

-Causes of Action: Defamation, Civil Conspiracy

-Time to Dismissal: Six months

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Result: Voluntarily dismissed after filing of TPPA Petition, followed by agreement not to refile.

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Liability avoided: $2 million ($0.00/$2 million recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs taxed to Plaintiff; appeal seeking attorney’s fees and sanctions dismissed pursuant to agreement not to refile dismissed claims

12. Hamilton County General Sessions Case No. 22GS3977 (Olivia Price v. Jennifer Tiehen)

-Causes of Action: Defamation

-Time to Dismissal: Ten weeks

-Result: Dismissed With Prejudice (TPPA Petition to Dismiss Granted)

-Liability avoided: $25,000.00 ($0.00/$25,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($14.803.65 attorney’s fee, cost and expense award)

13. Hamilton County General Sessions Case No. 22GS3977 (Donald S. Price v. Jennifer Tiehen)

-Causes of Action: Defamation

-Time to Dismissal: Ten weeks

-Result: Dismissed With Prejudice (TPPA Petition to Dismiss Granted)

-Liability avoided: $25,000.00 ($0.00/$25,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($14.803.65 attorney’s fee, cost and expense award)

14. Davidson County General Sessions Case No. 23GC5926 (Bill Darsinos and Southside Grill v. Hannah Olsen)

-Causes of Action: Defamation

-Time to Dismissal: 30 days

-Result: Dismissed With Prejudice (Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice in Response to TPPA Petition to Dismiss)

-Liability avoided: $25,000.00 ($0.00/$25,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Court costs taxed to Plaintiff

15.  Davidson County Circuit Court Case No. 23C891 (Michelle Foreman v. David Rosenberg)

-Causes of Action: Defamation

-Time to Dismissal: 41 days after filing of Amended Complaint

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Result: Dismissed With Prejudice (TPPA Petition to Dismiss granted)

-Liability avoided: $300,000.00 ($0.00/$300,000.00 recovered)

-Fee-shift: Yes ($35,455.00 attorney’s fee award; $100,000.00 sanctions order)

16.  Lincoln County Circuit Court Case No. 23CV132 (Dorothy Small, Tonya Allen, and Roger Martinez v. Jon Law and Tina Marie Sanders)

-Causes of Action: Invasion of Privacy

-Time to Dismissal: Three months after filing of Complaint

-Discovery: No (dismissal pre-discovery)

-Result: Dismissed With Prejudice (TPPA Petition to Dismiss granted)

-Fee-shift: Yes (pending appeal)

Prior Restraints:

1. Lynne S. Cherry, et al. v. Del Frisco’s Grille of Tennessee, LLC, et al., Case No. M2022-00218-COA-R10-CV (on behalf of restrained non-party)—Tennessee Court of Appeals

*Order of the Tennessee Court of Appeals Vacating Restraint

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-TechDirt: Appeals Court Smacks Down Unconstitutional Injunction Obtained By A Lawyer To Silence Someone Who Left A Negative Review

2. Patrick Malone v. James William Rose, Case No. M2023-01453-COA-WR-CV—Tennessee Court of Appeals

Opinion vacating prior restraint

Brief in Support of Certiorari

3. Denton’s Electronics, Inc. v. Lucas Roberson, Case No. M2023-00081-COA-R10-CV—Tennessee Court of Appeals

*Order of Voluntary Dismissal

Order to Respond

Mootness Order

Rule 10 Application

 

  • $0.00
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Professional and Prompt

September 19, 2022 — Retained for Anti-Slapp Case due to numerous false allocations for years that resulted in ongoing court appearances, legal fees, and living in fear. Mr. Horwitz and his staff hit the ground running. Their communications and follow through is absolutely superb. This lawyer cares about you, your investment in his practice and your well being. In my eyes he’s been a God sent. I can’t emphasize the gratitude we have for him. If you’re looking for someone to represent you in an Anti-Slapp, he’s your guy! Thank you!! Thank you!!!

The Best Defamation/Anti-SLAPP Attorney in Nashville

June 10, 2020 — If you are contemplating paying the consult fee like I was, save yourself the time and energy of talking to other attorneys and being disappointed. This is Daniel’s bread and butter and be genuinely cares about his clients and that they see justice. He was able to get the lawsuit filed against me dismissed with prejudice in 10 weeks (with four of those weeks being an extension due to COVID-19 shutting the courts down) with awarded attorney fees. He is extremely knowledgeable and eloquent in his writing and responses. I cannot say enough good things about my experience working with Daniel!

Selected First Amendment and Speech Defense Case History